I’m sorry to inform you that vibrations don’t pay bills. Specifically, open source code. As long as I watched the open source, there is a tendency to focus on the normative values of open source, ie why people should accept open source as if it were a morally better way to build software. But software where an open source or profitical is just a tool to achieve them. When the open source is a “good” and closed source is “bad”, it depends entirely on white, helps development and customers make things more efficiently.
As the CEO of Redis Rowan Trollope recently told me, for the average developer, this is not an open or closed licensing question, but rather: “Does this thing Soomode offer something unique and differentiated… Which do I need in my application?”
With regard to this, it is worth paying attention to where the money moves in AI, the hottest market in Tech. The AI poster child with an open source code embraces a face that generates a nice profit by putting it as a grind zero for AI with an open source code. The company really goes further and open source as the only way to make AI correctly. Well, the exception to this truth about the inconvenience on your website: “Llama is one of the first open source llms to overcome/compared the closed source.” Many of them would say that Llama is not an open source goal at all … Details! However, real money in AI are going to hyperscal clouds that are less idealistic for open source and much more focus on the comfort of the customer.